Color Preference Test


Introduction

Review of Literature

Dissemination of Research

Technology Issues and Decisions

Phase I: Color Preference Test

Phase II: Shades of Difference

Phase III: Website Preferences

Phase IV: Alternative Presentations of Identical Content

Conclusions

Bibliography

 

 

 

Phase1 | Quantitative Data Analysis

Data Description

Statistical Analysis

Blue was the overwhelming preference for both males and females in the initial color preference testing. This choice held true for both the Moonscape and Technopets although the male preference for blue was slightly more marked (6.1%)for Technopets than for Moonscape where there was only at .5% difference between male and female preference. Overall, 48% of the study participants preferred blue over yellow, red, and green.

Study participants were also asked to select which related link they would choose to visit next after visiting the initial web page. These links fell into the three broad categories of artistic, technological and social. Results showed that females were much more diverse in their choices than males, especially in Technopets where males overwhelmingly chose Artificial Intelligence and had no interest in three of the other categories.

In order to examine whether there are significant differences in color, link and shade preference between males and females, we ran chi-square analysis on questionnaire data using SPSS. The results show that:

1. There is no significant gender difference in color preference in the two tests (Moonscape: X2 =1.315, p=0.73; Technopet: X2=0.657, p=0.88).

2. There is significant gender difference in link preference in both tests (Moonscape: X2 =25.86, p<0.05; Technopet: X2 =19.8, p <0.05).

3. There is significant gender difference in category of link choice in moonscape but not in Technopet. (Moonscape: X2=12.59, p<0.05; Technopet: X2=0.96, p=0.62).

4. There is no significant difference in color preference between Moonscape and Technopet (X2=4.954, p=0.175).

Project C.O.P.E.: Content, Organization, Preference, Evaluation
Principal Investigator: Kay E. Vandergrift, Professor
Research Team: Janet Hilbun, Ph.D. Student and Graduate Assistant; Lin Lin, Ph.D. Student and Teaching Assistant; Alex Daley, Manager, Information Technology Services; Jane Anne Hannigan, Professor Emerita, Columbia University, Consultant (Members of the team conducting the actual research have passed the Human Subjects Certification Program)

Photography: Lin Lin

School of Communication, Information and Library Studies, SCILS - Rutgers University