Displaying 5361 - 5370 of 8617
Aakhus, M. & Greenfeld-Benovitz, M. (2008). Argument reconstruction and socio-technical facilitation of large scale argumentation. In P. J. Ågerfalk, H. Delugach, and M. Lind (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Pragmatic Web: Innovating the Interactive Society, ICPW '08, vol. 363 (pp. 77-81). New York: ACM.
Aakhus, M. & Ziek, P. (2008). Sustainability Communication: A role for IT and IS in Relating Business and Society. In P. J. Ågerfalk, M. Aakhus, & M. Lind (Eds.), Proceedings of the Inaugural Meeting of AIS SIGPrag (pp. 29-37). (Invited position paper).
Aakhus, M. (2010). Transparency work and argumentation design in deliberation about business in society. In D. Gouran (Ed.), The functions of argument and social context: Selected papers from the 16th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (pp. 11-17). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
Aakhus, M., Muresan, S., & Wacholder, N. (2014). Integrating natural language processing and pragmatic argumentation theories for argumentation support. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013 (pp. 1-12). Windsor, ON: OSSA.
Aakhus, M. & Lewinski, M. (2014). Toward a polylogical analysis of argumentation: Disagreement space in the public controversy about fracking. B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), The Proceedings of the 8th International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1-11). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M. Janier, M. Aakhus, C. Reed, & K. Budzynska. (in press). Modeling impasse in argumentative activity with Inference Anchoring Theory: The case of impasse in mediation. To appear in D. Mohammed & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon Portugal.
Aakhus, M. (in press). Understanding the competence involved in constructing argumentative contexts. To appear in D. Mohammed & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon Portugal.
Aakhus, M. (1999). Science court: A case study in designing discourse to manage policy controversy. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 2(3), 20-37.
Aakhus, M. (2000). Constituting deliberation as “buy-in” through GDSS design and implementation. The Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronique de Communication [Online], 10(1). Available: http://www.cios.org/www/ejcrec2.htm.
Aakhus, M. (2001). Technocratic and design stances toward communication expertise: How GDSS facilitators understand their work. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 341-371.