Displaying 3041 - 3050 of 5108
Aakhus, M. & Bzdak, M. (2011, November). Revisiting “shared value” in developing markets: What is the role of philanthropy? Presented at the annual colloquium of the Academy for Business in Society, Fontainebleau, France.
M. Janier, M. Aakhus, C. Reed, & K. Budzynska. (2015, June). Modeling impasse in argumentative activity with Inference Anchoring Theory: The case of impasse in mediation. Presented at the First European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon Portugal.
Aakhus, M. (2015, June). Understanding the competence involved in constructing argumentative contexts. Presented at the First European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon Portugal.
Ågerfalk, P., Aakhus, M., & Lind, M. (2010). Researching Open Innovation through social media. Open Innovation Forum. (8 pages). [Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/30882386?access_key=key-1jfy9vze0spw4m0q1ybv]
Aakhus, M. (2014). Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (eds): Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies. Argumentation. doi:10.1007/s10503-014-9313-7 (Book Review)
Aakhus, M. (2002). Decision-making and group communication. In J. R. Schement (Ed.), Encyclopedia of communication (pp. 379-382). New York: MacMillan Reference.
Katz, J. & Aakhus, M. (2002). Making meaning of mobiles: A theory of Apparatgeist. In J. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 301-320). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jacobs, S. & Aakhus, M. (2002). How to resolve a conflict: Two models of dispute resolution. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp. 29-44). Newport News, VA: Vale Press.
Aakhus, M. & Jackson, S. (2005). Technology, interaction, and design. In K. Fitch & R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 411-437). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Aakhus, M. & Vasilyeva, A. (2008). Managing disagreement space in multiparty deliberation. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Ed.), Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (pp. 197-214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.