Bagley-Koyle, S. & Aakhus, M. (2002). Presuppostions about “good communication:” An assessment of online discourse. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the Computer Supported Cooperative Learning (pp. 641- 642). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Weger, H. & Aakhus, M. (2002). Argumentation and the design of discourse: Televised town hall meetings and argument in the public sphere. In F. H. van Eemeren, A. Blair, & C. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1059-1065). Amsterdam: SICSAT.

Aakhus, M. (2004). Understanding the Socio-Technical Gap: A case of GDSS Facilitation. In G. Goldkuhl, M. Lind, & S. Cronholm (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2cd International Conference on Action in Language, Organisations, and Information Systems (pp. 137-148). Linköping, Sweden: Research Network VITS.

Aakhus, M. (2004). Felicity conditions and genre: Linking act and conversation in LAP style conversation analysis. In Aakhus, M. & Lind, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Working Conference on the Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (pp. 131-142). New Brunswick, NJ.

Aakhus, M. (2005). Communication Design: Understanding the Unintended and Unanticipated Shaping of Decisions, Disputes, and Learning through Communication. In S. Buckingham-Shum (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Compendium Institute Workshop (pp. 25-28). London: Knowledge Media Institute.

Aakhus, M., Voon, W. & Liu, Y-H. (2005). Explicating tacit experiences in organizations: Evidence from online interns’ discourse. In S. Hawamdeh (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 41-52). Singapore: World Scientific.

Aakhus, M. (2010). Transparency work and argumentation design in deliberation about business in society. In D. Gouran (Ed.), The functions of argument and social context: Selected papers from the 16th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (pp. 11-17). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.

Aakhus, M., Muresan, S., & Wacholder, N. (2014). Integrating natural language processing and pragmatic argumentation theories for argumentation support. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013 (pp. 1-12). Windsor, ON: OSSA.

Aakhus, M. & Lewinski, M. (2014). Toward a polylogical analysis of argumentation: Disagreement space in the public controversy about fracking. B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), The Proceedings of the 8th International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1-11). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

M. Janier, M. Aakhus, C. Reed, & K. Budzynska. (in press). Modeling impasse in argumentative activity with Inference Anchoring Theory: The case of impasse in mediation. To appear in D. Mohammed & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon Portugal.