Aakhus, M. & Vasilyeva, A. (2007). Making, challenging, and defending a proposal: The emergence and evolution of disagreement space in a multi-party deliberation. In Eemeren, F. H. van, Garssen, B., Blair, T., & Willard, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SICSAT.

Aakhus, M. (2007). Exploring the gap between interaction and institutional orders in Pragmatic Web design. In S. Buckingham Shum, M. Lind, & H. Weigand (Eds.), Proceedings ICPW'07: 2nd International Conference on the Pragmatic Web (pp. 9-16). Tilburg: NL.

Aakhus, M. & Greenfeld-Benovitz, M. (2008). Argument reconstruction and socio-technical facilitation of large scale argumentation. In P. J. Ågerfalk, H. Delugach, and M. Lind (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Pragmatic Web: Innovating the Interactive Society, ICPW '08, vol. 363 (pp. 77-81). New York: ACM.

Aakhus, M. & Ziek, P. (2008). Sustainability Communication: A role for IT and IS in Relating Business and Society. In P. J. Ågerfalk, M. Aakhus, & M. Lind (Eds.), Proceedings of the Inaugural Meeting of AIS SIGPrag (pp. 29-37). (Invited position paper).

Aakhus, M. (2010). Transparency work and argumentation design in deliberation about business in society. In D. Gouran (Ed.), The functions of argument and social context: Selected papers from the 16th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (pp. 11-17). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.

Aakhus, M., Muresan, S., & Wacholder, N. (2014). Integrating natural language processing and pragmatic argumentation theories for argumentation support. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013 (pp. 1-12). Windsor, ON: OSSA.

Aakhus, M. & Lewinski, M. (2014). Toward a polylogical analysis of argumentation: Disagreement space in the public controversy about fracking. B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), The Proceedings of the 8th International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1-11). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

M. Janier, M. Aakhus, C. Reed, & K. Budzynska. (in press). Modeling impasse in argumentative activity with Inference Anchoring Theory: The case of impasse in mediation. To appear in D. Mohammed & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon Portugal.

Aakhus, M. (in press). Understanding the competence involved in constructing argumentative contexts. To appear in D. Mohammed & M. Lewinski (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon Portugal.

Aakhus, M. (1999). Science court: A case study in designing discourse to manage policy controversy. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 2(3), 20-37.